Sen. Warren seeking to break up Facebook/Amazon/et/al just like previous generation broke up Ma Bell (AT&T)

By: ( +David Herron; Date: March 8, 2019

Tags: Politics » Amazon » Facebook » Google

Today Sen. Elizabeth posted a manifesto saying Facebook, Amazon, Google, etc, are too big, monopolistic, have too much control over commerce and society, and therefore the government needs to step in and break them up. Cue howls of protests from Libertarians, I suppose?

Is Sen. Warren an out of control LIBERAL in this case? Is this proposal to break up big companies like Facebook or Google sound or crazy? Often the response to proposals like this is that LIBERALS (as if Liberalism is a disease) want to punish successful corporations, when we should be applauding these as successes of the capitalistic system.

What I read from Sen. Warren's manifesto is that it is quite possible for a company to develop into a monopoly, and using that monopolistic position to unfairly squash smaller competitors.

Such a process -- and it does happen -- is not fair open capitalistic competition. It is powerful players twisting the game to their own ends. Sen. Warren's manifesto calling for the breakup of big tech giants has some merit, in other words.

We do have to ask whether this goes too far, or whether it is incorrect in any way.

Are "tech giants" like Facebook, Amazon, Google, etc actual monopolies?

The Warren Manifesto uses this word a lot, claiming that these companies are monopolies, and are abusing the monopolistic position to unfairly tilt the marketplace and squash competitors.

You might think this is crazy-talk. Facebook is not the only social media network, Amazon is not the only online shopping website, Google is not the only search engine, Google does not operate the only advertising service, etc. How can they be monopolies?

According to Wikipedia a Monopoly is:

A monopoly exists when a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular commodity. This contrasts with a monopsony which relates to a single entity's control of a market to purchase a good or service, and with oligopoly which consists of a few sellers dominating a market.

In other words, my gut reaction that none of these companies have sole solitary control over a particular commodity is accurate. Each are facing competition in the same niches. Going by this the more technically accurate word is probably Monopsony. For this word Wikipedia says:

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which a single buyer substantially controls the market as the major purchaser of goods and services offered by many would-be sellers.

That description is a better fit for the likes of Facebook/Google/Amazon. Granted almost nobody knows that word - Monopsony. Sen. Warren is probably smart to call these companies Monopolies because if she used Monopsony everyone would scratch their head and go HUH?

Monopoly/Monopsony is semantics - What do we do about the dominance of these companies?

Further on in this post I go over some details that I think demonstrate how these companies in particular are dominating the landscape. It shouldn't take too much convincing because the dominance is right in our faces every day. Most of us turn to Facebook to communicate with friends, or to Google to find information, or Amazon to buy things.

Is this a problem?

Each, because of their dominant position, is skewing the marketplace of ideas, communication, or products. Each can therefore present to us a tailored version of reality.

One apropos phrase is "Confirmation Bias" meaning our tendency to agree with information that confirms ideas already floating in our minds. Because these companies present us things it thinks we want to know, they can feed a Confirmation Bias Syndrome.

For example Google News probably selects news items/sources to show based on what Google thinks is our interests, down to the news sources we're likely to interact with. The most informed folks are the ones reading the widest array of news/information sources. But if Google News shows us news from a limited set of news sources, selected based on perceived preferences, the result could be we are misinformed. Google News would be showing us only things we tend to agree with, feeding confirmation bias and preventing us from broadening our horizon.

For "harm" the Warren Manifesto points to a few clear examples:

  • Amazon has all the sales data it needs to learn about hot selling items - and does, under the Amazon Basics brand, launch products that compete with the hot brands. e.g. the mouse I'm using is from Amazon Basics, it is a very fine mouse but perhaps Logitech thinks it as unfair competition.
  • Google has sometimes been found to squish search results about competing search engines, and has promoted its own restaurant/etc reviews over Yelp's. A couple months ago I noted that Google's search results screen today strongly downplays organic search results in favor of a combination of paid advertising and its own services: Google Ads manipulates Google search results

Warren Manifesto suggests government regulation or breaking up the companies

To Sen. Warren when the US Dept of Justice sued Microsoft over its monopolistic practices, and won the lawsuit, that gives a great example what to do. Rather than break up Microsoft, the DoJ put Microsoft under strict regulatory control. That may have had a good result in hindsight, since Microsoft is a very different company than the old days.

The choice of the consumer

These companies have power because we give them power every time we choose to use their services.

We as consumers can choose to use other services or products.

If enough of us choose something else, then the existing powerhouses will crumple. Perhaps only to be replaced by some other powerhouse? As they say, the King is Dead, Long Live the King.

The best result is for a healthy open competitive playing field with lots of companies in competition. Hence one person might choose to buy from Rakuten, another from NewEgg, and so on.

The Monopsonic behavior of Facebook, Google, Amazon

Having read that definition I think we can all agree these companies are dominant forces in the areas they operate.

Facebook is hardly the only social media network, but it is abundantly clear that Facebook is dominant in this space. The management of Twitter may beg to differ, but Facebook is extremely huge as a social media network. The Warren Manifesto points to its mergers with WhatsApp and Instagram as an example of squashing competition.

A statement by Mark Zuckerberg in 2018 is used as further proof: "In a lot of ways Facebook is more like a government than a traditional company." That came from a long ( Guardian article titled "Facebook’s war on free will". That article describes Facebook as:

In reality, Facebook is a tangle of rules and procedures for sorting information, rules devised by the corporation for the ultimate benefit of the corporation. Facebook is always surveilling users, always auditing them, using them as lab rats in its behavioural experiments. While it creates the impression that it offers choice, in truth Facebook paternalistically nudges users in the direction it deems best for them, which also happens to be the direction that gets them thoroughly addicted.

To an extent this is not unique to Facebook, as every social media network is going to have an algorithm for determining what postings to show to users. Hence, every one of these networks is conducting experiments as to what postings are best to show to whom. YouTube for instance has recently gotten heat over preferencing conspiracy videos because conspiracy videos tend to be played more frequently therefore earning YouTube more advertising revenue.

Every social media network is looking to addict the users. Heck, websites in general are rewarded for a type of addiction. In content marketing circles we are told to increase "dwell time" of our visitors, and to seek ways to get visitors to return to the site. Taken to an extreme, yes one can call that attempting to addict the users.

A few days ago Facebook announced a promise to reform itself: Facebook promises 'A Privacy-Focused Vision for Social Networking'

Pardon us for being skeptical, since Facebook has made this promise many times before.

Last month I noted that Facebook is ignoring false advertising - I reported several fake ads, which Facebook refused to take action on: Facebook ignoring reported advertisement containing outright lies

Google is such a multi-pronged entity that it is hard to pin down. Google's transition from a single corporation to Alphabet as an umbrella over approximately 26 companies is an example. Is Google merely a search engine? Most of Alphabet's revenue comes from advertising, so is it merely an advertising company? Or because YouTube is the largest video sharing website (and second largest search engine) is YouTube a TV network?

Google is clearly the dominant search engine -- just look at web traffic sources on any website and you'll see a huge amount of referrals from Google. The big goal of website owners is increasing organic search results from Google, as an example of Google's dominance.

Google's YouTube is clearly the dominant video sharing service. There are other video sharing sites, but YouTube is the prominent such place.

Google's Ads network is clearly the dominant advertising platform. It is embedded on zillions of third party websites (including this one), and is used in YouTube advertising, Google Search advertising, etc etc. Demonstration of Google's power as an advertising platform is the number of courses on Udemy offering to teach mastery of Google Ads to drive traffic to a website. On the other hand, Facebook also has a very strong advertising platform and there are many Udemy courses teaching mastery of Facebook advertising for the same purpose.

While Google is not alone in the advertising field, it has a hugely strong position. I have looked many times for an alternative to displaying Adsense advertising, and have not found anything worthy.

Amazon is another multi-pronged entity. Most obviously Amazon is a dominant online shopping website. But... go to the Amazon website, then scroll down to the very bottom of the page and look at the footer area. Amazon lists in the footer all their various businesses, including Comixology (comic book distribution), Amazon Restaurants (food delivery from restaurants), CreateSpace (book publisher), and on and on and on.

The Warren Manifesto latches onto one statistic - that nearly half of all e-commerce occurs through Amazon.

Clearly Amazon is at the top of peoples minds when they're looking for things to buy. It seems many people are addicted to Amazon Prime, what with Amazon's promised 1-day delivery feeding the instant gratification complex.

E-Books is an area strongly dominated by Amazon. There are other e-book marketplaces, but none of the market reach of Kindle. The downside of this is that e-book capabilities are held back because of limitations of the Kindle platform versus the huge breadth of technical capabilities that EPUB3 offers.

Read More

Read the Team Warren manifesto here: (

« Google Adsense shows ad leading to site Google knows is bad/dangerous - WTF? Apple quietly fixes MacBook Pro 'Flexgate' design flaw -- leaving owners of 2015-2017 MBP's hanging »
2016 Election 2018 Elections Acer C720 Ad block Affiliate marketing Air Filters Air Quality Air Quality Monitoring AkashaCMS Amazon Amazon Kindle Amazon Web Services America Amiga and Jon Pertwee Android Anti-Fascism AntiVirus Software Apple Apple Flexgate Apple Hardware History Apple Hardware Mistakes Apple iPhone Apple iPhone Hardware April 1st Arduino ARM Compilation Artificial Intelligence Astronomy Astrophotography Asynchronous Programming Authoritarianism Automated Social Posting AWS DynamoDB AWS Lambda Ayo.JS Bells Law Big Brother Big Data Big Finish Big Science Bitcoin Mining Black Holes Blade Runner Blockchain Blogger Blogging Books Botnets Cassette Tapes Cellphones China China Manufacturing Christopher Eccleston Chrome Chrome Apps Chromebook Chromebox ChromeOS CIA CitiCards Citizen Journalism Civil Liberties Climate Change Clinton Cluster Computing Command Line Tools Comment Systems Computer Accessories Computer Hardware Computer Repair Computers Conservatives Cross Compilation Crouton Cryptocurrency Curiosity Rover Currencies Cyber Security Cybermen Cybersecurity Daleks Darth Vader Data backup Data Formats Data Storage Database Database Backup Databases David Tenant DDoS Botnet Department of Defense Department of Justice Detect Adblocker Developers Editors Digital audio Digital Nomad Digital Photography Direct Attach Storage Diskless Booting Disqus DIY DIY Repair DNP3 Do it yourself Docker Docker MAMP Docker Swarm Doctor Who Doctor Who Paradox Doctor Who Review Drobo Drupal Drupal Themes DuckDuckGo DVD E-Books E-Readers Early Computers eGPU Election Hacks Electric Bicycles Electric Vehicles Electron Eliminating Jobs for Human Emdebian Encabulators Energy Efficiency Enterprise Node EPUB ESP8266 Ethical Curation Eurovision Event Driven Asynchronous Express Face Recognition Facebook Fake Advertising Fake News Fedora VirtualBox Fifth Doctor File transfer without iTunes FireFly Flash Flickr Fraud Freedom of Speech Front-end Development G Suite Gallifrey Gig Economy git Github GitKraken Gitlab GMAIL Google Google Adsense Google Chrome Google Gnome Google+ Government Spying Great Britain Green Transportation Hate Speech Heat Loss Hibernate High Technology Hoax Science Home Automation HTTP Security HTTPS Human ID I2C Protocol Image Analysis Image Conversion Image Processing ImageMagick In-memory Computing Incognito Mode InfluxDB Infrared Thermometers Insulation Internet Internet Advertising Internet Law Internet of Things Internet Policy Internet Privacy iOS iOS Devices iPad iPhone iPhone hacking Iron Man iShowU Audio Capture iTunes Janet Fielding Java JavaFX JavaScript JavaScript Injection JDBC John Simms Journalism Joyent jQuery Kaspersky Labs Kext Kindle Kindle Marketplace Large Hadron Collider Lets Encrypt LibreOffice Linux Linux Hints Linux Single Board Computers Logging Mac Mini Mac OS Mac OS X Mac Pro MacBook Pro Machine Learning Machine Readable ID Macintosh macOS macOS High Sierra macOS Kext MacOS X setup Make Money Online Make Money with Gigs March For Our Lives MariaDB Mars Mass Violence Matt Lucas MEADS Anti-Missile Mercurial MERN Stack Michele Gomez Micro Apartments Microsoft Military AI Military Hardware Minification Minimized CSS Minimized HTML Minimized JavaScript Missy Mobile Applications Mobile Computers MODBUS Mondas Monetary System MongoDB Mongoose Monty Python MQTT Music Player Music Streaming MySQL NanoPi Nardole NASA Net Neutrality Network Attached Storage Node Web Development Node.js Node.js Database Node.js Performance Node.js Testing Node.JS Web Development Node.x North Korea npm NSA NVIDIA NY Times Online advertising Online Community Online Fraud Online Journalism Online News Online Photography Online Video Open Media Vault Open Source Open Source and Patents Open Source Governance Open Source Licenses Open Source Software OpenAPI OpenJDK OpenVPN Palmtop PDA Patrick Troughton PayPal Paywalls Personal Flight Peter Capaldi Peter Davison Phishing Photography PHP Plex Plex Media Server Political Protest Politics Postal Service Power Control President Trump Privacy Private E-mail server Production use Public Violence Raspberry Pi Raspberry Pi 3 Raspberry Pi Zero ReactJS Recaptcha Recycling Refurbished Computers Remote Desktop Removable Storage Renewable Energy Republicans Retro Computing Retro-Technology Reviews RFID Rich Internet Applications Right to Repair River Song Robotics Robots Rocket Ships RSS News Readers rsync Russia Russia Troll Factory Russian Hacking Rust SCADA Scheme Science Fiction SD Cards Search Engine Ranking Search Engines Season 1 Season 10 Season 11 Security Security Cameras Server-side JavaScript Serverless Framework Servers Shell Scripts Silence Simsimi Skype SmugMug Social Media Social Media Networks Social Media Warfare Social Network Management Social Networks Software Development Software Patents Space Flight Space Ship Reuse Space Ships SpaceX Spear Phishing Spring Spring Boot Spy Satellites SQLite3 SSD Drives SSD upgrade SSH SSH Key SSL Stand For Truth Strange Parts Swagger Synchronizing Files Tegan Jovanka Telescopes Terrorism The Cybermen The Daleks The Master Time-Series Database Tom Baker Torchwood Total Information Awareness Trump Trump Administration Trump Campaign Twitter Ubuntu Udemy UDOO US Department of Defense Video editing Virtual Private Networks VirtualBox VLC VNC VOIP Vue.js Walmart Weapons Systems Web Applications Web Developer Resources Web Development Web Development Tools Web Marketing Webpack Website Advertising Website Business Models Weeping Angels WhatsApp William Hartnell Window Insulation Windows Windows Alternatives Wordpress World Wide Web Yahoo YouTube YouTube Adpocalypse YouTube Monetization