<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Documents tagged with JavaFX]]></title><description><![CDATA[Documents tagged with JavaFX]]></description><link>https://techsparx.comjavafx.xml</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 21:14:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title><![CDATA[JavaFX 1.0 is launched]]></title><description><![CDATA[You can view the updated site, launch videos, sample apps, and more, at javafx.com .. well .. when the server comes back up, it's having a little bit of trouble at this moment. Anyway, I want to post a few thoughts..]]></description><link>https://techsparx.com/archive/java.net/2008/12/javafx.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://techsparx.com/archive/java.net/2008/12/javafx.html</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 07:59:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The iPad, the Flash kerfluffle, Applets and JavaFX]]></title><description><![CDATA[Last week Apple released their latest product destined to change the world (the iPad).  At least that's what they want us to believe.  Perhaps the biggest controversy over the thing is the lack of Flash capability.  However this being java.net I have to wonder out loud, where is Java capability, and more importantly why isn't as much controversy being raised over Java being missing? But I think we all can enumerate some reasons for both being missing.  And it's worth it for the Java community to ponder this issue.]]></description><link>https://techsparx.com/archive/java.net/2010/02/ipad-flash.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://techsparx.com/archive/java.net/2010/02/ipad-flash.html</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 07:59:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>