<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Documents tagged with Citizen Journalism]]></title><description><![CDATA[Documents tagged with Citizen Journalism]]></description><link>https://techsparx.comcitizen-journalism.xml</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 21:14:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title><![CDATA[The demise of examiner.com, what's it mean for citizen journalism?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It wasn't that long ago that online news sites began killing off the traditional news services.  Many newspapers and magazines have either shut down (costing many cities a vitally necessary check on local government), or else shrank, or else transitioned to an online service.  A generation of writers and journalists are under turmoil in a time period where we desperately need a check on the powerful elite.   The 1% are in the process of doing grave harm to democracy and good governance around the world, and we need the Press to fulfill its rightful role. </p>

<p>One of the bright spots was the rise of citizen journalism - with one of the biggest such websites being examiner.com.  Examiner.com allowed "anyone" to sign up to start writing articles, and had arranged with the likes of Google News to be a recognized news source.  The result was .. uh .. spotty, since many Examiner writers did not try to practice proper journalism.  A few, such as myself, did take the work seriously and produced good work through examiner.com.  </p>
]]></description><link>https://techsparx.com/blog/2016/07/examiner-demise.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://techsparx.com/blog/2016/07/examiner-demise.html</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:00:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>